Proses Pemecahan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Tahapan Mason Ditinjau dari Tipe Adversity Quotient
Keywords:
Proses Pemecahan Masalah, SPLDV, Tahapan Mason, Adversity Quotient
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses pemecahan masalah matematika sistem persamaan linear dua variabel berdasarkan tahapan Mason ditinjau dari tipe adversity quotient (AQ). Penelitian deskriptif dengan teknik pengambilan data berdasarkan angket Adversity Response Profile (ARP) dilaksanakan di MTs Negeri 1 Kota Bima pada 119 siswa kelas IX. Penelitian yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini mempertimbangkan siswa yang memiliki tingkat AQ tinggi (climber), AQ sedang (camper) dan AQ rendah (quitter) berdasarkan angket ARP. Instrument yang digunakan adalah angket, lembar tes dan wawancara. Untuk mendeskripsikan secara kualitatif maka diambil 6 siswa yang diambil masing-masing 2 siswa berdasarkan setiap kategori Adversity Quotient dengan rekomendasi guru dan kesediaan siswa menjadi subjek penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam proses pemecahan masalah siswa berdasarkan tahapan Mason, dimana siswa dapat memenuhi semua tahapan Mason: entry, attack, dan review. Untuk siswa camper hanya memenuhi tahapan entry dan attack saja. Sedangkan siswa quitter belum mampu memenuhi semua aspek entry, attack, dan review.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adnyani, L. P. W., Kurniawan, I., & Pinahayu, E. A. R. (2018). Development of Creative-Thinking Instrument in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Logical Mathematics Intelligence. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5201
Agustini, D., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi SPLDV. Jurnal Media Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1).
Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics Curriculum Development and the Role of Problem Solving. In ACSA Conference, 1–8.
Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
Bautista, M. J. C. (2015). Adversity Quotient and Teaching Performance of Faculty Members. 5(3), 1–6.
Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean Student’s Mathematical Thingking in Problem Solving nnd Problem Posing: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Mathematical of Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
Chin, P.-L., & Hung, M.-L. (2013). Psychological Contract Breach and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Roles of Adversity Quotient and Gender. Scientific Journal Publishers, 41(5), 843 – 859.
Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar tingkat SD, MI, dan SDLB. Depdiknas.
Fauzi, A. M., & Noviartati, K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching Tipe Tandur Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(3), 240–248.
Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020). European Journal of Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research Volume, 9(2), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537
Febriana, E. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Kelas XI Pada Materi Program Linier.
Gok, T. (2014). Students’ achievement, skill and confidence in using stepwise problem-solving strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1223a
Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3907
Harahap, R., Dewi, I., & Sumarno. (2012). Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Kontekstual dengan Kooperatif Tipe STAD di SMP Al-Washliyah 8 Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, 5(2), 186–204.
Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Murwani, F. D. (2020). The effect of experiential learning and adversity quotient on problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13156a
Jiang, R., Liu, R. de, Star, J., Zhen, R., Wang, J., Hong, W., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., & Fu, X. (2021). How mathematics anxiety affects students’ inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12364
Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, & Usodo, B. (2020). International Journal of Educational Methodology The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education : A Review of the Literature on Educational Development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507
Karatas, I., & Baki, A. (2013). The Effect of Learning Environments Based on Problem Solving on Students ’ Achievements of Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(3), 249–267.
Maimunah, Purwanto, Sa’dijah, C., & Sisworo. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas X-A SMA AL-Musilum. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 17–30.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically. Pearson Education.
MZ, Z. A., Risnawati, R., Kurniati, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning (Quantitative Study on Students Boarding School in Pekanbaru). International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5780
Parvathy, D. U., & M, P. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Academic Problems among Student Teachers. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191172326
Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). ADVERSITY QUOTIENT: A New Paradigm in Management to Explore. The International Journal’s : Research Journal of Social Science and Management , 3(4), 67–79. www.theinternationaljournal.org
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery on Understanding. Learning and Teaching Problem Solving. John Willey & Sons.
Reif, F., & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics. Educational Psychologist, 17(2), 17(2), 102–127.
Şimşek, İ., Uygun, T., & Güner, P. (2020). Problem Solving Performance And Mathematics Achievement : The Mediating Role Of Eye Tracking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 1111–1124.
Stoltz, P (2000). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (T. Hermaya (ed.)). Grasindo.
Suarsana, I. M., Lestari, I. A. P. D., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019). The effect of online problem posing on students’ problem-solving abilitiy in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12152a
Sudarman. (2008). Pembangkit Motivasi Siswa dalam Belajar Matematika. 36–40.
Suryaningrum, C. W., Purwanto, Subanji, Susanto, H., Ningtyas, Y. D. W. K., & Irfan,
M. (2020). Semiotic reasoning emerges in constructing properties of a rectangle: A study of adversity quotient. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110
Susanto, A. (2015). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Disekolah Dasar. Prenada Media.
Wahyudi, & Dewi, A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Tentang Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Teori Van Hiele. Seminar Nasional Matematika X Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016, 481–494.
Widyastuti, R., Usodo, B., & Riyadi. (2017). Proses Berpikir Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah- Langkah Polya. Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 1(3), 239–249.
Yulaelawati, E. (2004). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: Filosofi Teori dan Aplikasi. Pakar Raya.
Agustini, D., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi SPLDV. Jurnal Media Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1).
Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics Curriculum Development and the Role of Problem Solving. In ACSA Conference, 1–8.
Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
Bautista, M. J. C. (2015). Adversity Quotient and Teaching Performance of Faculty Members. 5(3), 1–6.
Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean Student’s Mathematical Thingking in Problem Solving nnd Problem Posing: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Mathematical of Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
Chin, P.-L., & Hung, M.-L. (2013). Psychological Contract Breach and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Roles of Adversity Quotient and Gender. Scientific Journal Publishers, 41(5), 843 – 859.
Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar tingkat SD, MI, dan SDLB. Depdiknas.
Fauzi, A. M., & Noviartati, K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching Tipe Tandur Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(3), 240–248.
Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020). European Journal of Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research Volume, 9(2), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537
Febriana, E. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Kelas XI Pada Materi Program Linier.
Gok, T. (2014). Students’ achievement, skill and confidence in using stepwise problem-solving strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1223a
Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3907
Harahap, R., Dewi, I., & Sumarno. (2012). Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Kontekstual dengan Kooperatif Tipe STAD di SMP Al-Washliyah 8 Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, 5(2), 186–204.
Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Murwani, F. D. (2020). The effect of experiential learning and adversity quotient on problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13156a
Jiang, R., Liu, R. de, Star, J., Zhen, R., Wang, J., Hong, W., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., & Fu, X. (2021). How mathematics anxiety affects students’ inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12364
Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, & Usodo, B. (2020). International Journal of Educational Methodology The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education : A Review of the Literature on Educational Development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507
Karatas, I., & Baki, A. (2013). The Effect of Learning Environments Based on Problem Solving on Students ’ Achievements of Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(3), 249–267.
Maimunah, Purwanto, Sa’dijah, C., & Sisworo. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas X-A SMA AL-Musilum. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 17–30.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically. Pearson Education.
MZ, Z. A., Risnawati, R., Kurniati, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning (Quantitative Study on Students Boarding School in Pekanbaru). International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5780
Parvathy, D. U., & M, P. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Academic Problems among Student Teachers. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191172326
Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). ADVERSITY QUOTIENT: A New Paradigm in Management to Explore. The International Journal’s : Research Journal of Social Science and Management , 3(4), 67–79. www.theinternationaljournal.org
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery on Understanding. Learning and Teaching Problem Solving. John Willey & Sons.
Reif, F., & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics. Educational Psychologist, 17(2), 17(2), 102–127.
Şimşek, İ., Uygun, T., & Güner, P. (2020). Problem Solving Performance And Mathematics Achievement : The Mediating Role Of Eye Tracking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 1111–1124.
Stoltz, P (2000). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (T. Hermaya (ed.)). Grasindo.
Suarsana, I. M., Lestari, I. A. P. D., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019). The effect of online problem posing on students’ problem-solving abilitiy in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12152a
Sudarman. (2008). Pembangkit Motivasi Siswa dalam Belajar Matematika. 36–40.
Suryaningrum, C. W., Purwanto, Subanji, Susanto, H., Ningtyas, Y. D. W. K., & Irfan,
M. (2020). Semiotic reasoning emerges in constructing properties of a rectangle: A study of adversity quotient. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110
Susanto, A. (2015). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Disekolah Dasar. Prenada Media.
Wahyudi, & Dewi, A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Tentang Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Teori Van Hiele. Seminar Nasional Matematika X Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016, 481–494.
Widyastuti, R., Usodo, B., & Riyadi. (2017). Proses Berpikir Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah- Langkah Polya. Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 1(3), 239–249.
Yulaelawati, E. (2004). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: Filosofi Teori dan Aplikasi. Pakar Raya.
Published
2022-02-04
How to Cite
Nurhayati, N., Subanji, S., & Rahardjo, S. (2022). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Tahapan Mason Ditinjau dari Tipe Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1239
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2022 Novi Nurhayati, Subanji Subanji, Swasono Rahardjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
